Path: rQ!rQdQ!remarQ73!supernews.com!remarQ.com!WCG!news.idt.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!193.190.198.38!news.belnet.be!newsgate.cistron.nl!het.net!newshub.bart.net!news.bart.net!news.bart.net!not-for-mail
From: Grady Ward <anonymous@nym.cypherpunks.org>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.claering.technology,alt.scientology
Subject: IR Revisions part 2
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:51:22 -0500
Organization: bART Internet Services
Lines: 539
Message-ID: <36E4465A.FA846D43@nym.cypherpunks.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mickey.2005.bart.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: freyja.bart.nl 920907994 19922 194.158.161.8 (8 Mar 1999 15:46:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bart.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 1999 15:46:34 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
Xref: rQ alt.religion.scientology:548500

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
      Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 20 FEBRUARY 1974R
      REVISED 25 APRIL 1991

      Remimeo 
      Expanded Dianetics 
           Auditors 
           C/Ses 
      M7/M4 starrate 
      Clay Demo

      INTROSPECTION RD
      ADDITIONAL ACTIONS

      RESPONSIBILITY STEP

      An additional step to the rundown has been found necessary, 
      especially in the case of a psychotic. This is the Responsibility
      Step. It 
      consists of doing ARC Breaks Long Duration Triple/Quad and 2WC 
      Recent Actions, taking up the best reading overt and running 
      Responsibility on it (i.e., What about could you be responsible
for?).
      If no 
      major increase in responsibility, take up another reading overt
and
      run 
      Responsibility on that. Do this until there is a significant
increase
      in 
      responsibility. Follow this with running all reading evil purposes
      brought 
      up during the Introspection steps of the RD with R3RA (omit on
Clears 
      and OTs). If the pc was found to R/S during the RD, the C/S would 
      program him for R/S handling-either Expanded Dianetics or NED for 
      OTs. Additionally, the C/S would note areas of low responsibility
and 
      order O/W run on those areas.

      PROGRAMING DATA

      In the case of a psycho it is necessary to tailor the
Introspection 
      RD steps to the pc, instead of following it as a rote sequence at
the
      risk of 
      running unreading items on the pc. On any pc this is deadly. In a
      psycho it 
      is pure dynamite.

      To do this the C/S would order the subjects of the RD steps 
      assessed, then handled in order of largest reads. The auditor's TR
1
      and 
      metering must be such that he can make a meter read. The RD could
be 
      made to fail on this point by missing hot subjects.

      THE CLEARED CANNIBAL FACTOR

      When you clear a cannibal what do you have? Experientially you 
      have a cannibal. His experiential track is such that he's been a
      cannibal for 
      ages. That's how he's handled life and people around him, that's
what
      he 
      knows how to do. This person is unaware of his responsibilities to
      other 
      dynamics and is unfamiliar with proper behavior and responsible
      actions 
      towards others. In the case of an SP, he has been busy destroying
      others 
      for so long that when he's somewhat cleaned up on this he does not
      know 
      what else to do or how to act. It's rather pathetic, actually.

      ISOLATION

      With someone in a psychotic break, it is necessary to isolate the 
      person for him to destimulate and to protect him and others from
      possible 
      damage. While in

      611

      isolation the person receives the Introspection RD done flawlessly
on
      a 
      shortsession basis, gradiently winning and gaining confidence.
Between

      sessions the muzzled rule is in force. No one speaks to the person
or
      in his 
      hearing.

      There comes a point where the C/S must decide to release the 
      person from isolation. To do this the C/S must know that the
person
      can 
      take responsibility for his actions as regards others, as well as
      toward 
      himself.

      C/S ACTION-CLEARED CANNIBAL STEP

      The C/S's action is a direct comm line to the person by notes. The 
      person is provided with paper and pen to reply. The C/S must
determine

      the person's responsibility level. Example: "Dear Joe, What can
you 
      guarantee me if you are let out of isolation?" If the person's
reply
      shows 
      continued irresponsibility toward other dynamics or fixation on
one 
      dynamic to the exclusion of others damaged, the C/S must inform
the 
      person of his continued isolation and why. Example: "Dear Joe, I'm
      sorry 
      but no go on coming out of isolation yet. Your actions threatened
the 
      survival of hundreds of people indirectly and six families
directly by

      burning down their houses. You are unaware of the effects this
could
      have 
      had and still only concerned about your own welfare. You must hate
the

      human race quite a bit."

      The C/S has drawn a conclusion based on the information he has 
      and lets the person know where he stands. He does not reintrovert
the
      pc 
      by asking him, "Why did you burn down those houses?" He draws an 
      accurate conclusion and indicates it.

      This will elicit a protest from the person and bring about an 
      involvement in the dynamics concerned. It also serves to bring
about
      an 
      awareness of consequences. Example: "But . . . but . . . I never
meant
      to 
      threaten others' survival. I just wanted to burn down the houses
      because I 
      like fires. Gosh. . . I didn't mean it. I don't hate the human
race. .
      . Oh! I 
      really don't hate the human race." Cognition.

      The person's auditing is continued between these exchanges. The 
      auditor may have to clean up some ARC breaks as the protest is
coming 
      off. Skillfully done, that's all the auditor should have to clean
up,
      except 
      maybe some more O/Ws. When it is obvious the person is out of his 
      psychosis and up to the responsibility of living with others his
      isolation is 
      ended.

      SUMMARY

      Handling the C/Sing and auditing on this RD requires a real 
      understanding of New Era Dianetics and Expanded Dianetics basics
and 
      the utmost precision of application. Its results are nothing short
of 
      miraculous. I hope this will be of further assistance to you.


      L. RON 
      HUBBARD
      Founder

      Assisted 
      by CS-4

      Revision 
      assisted by 
      LRH 
      Technical Research 
      and 
      Compilations

      612


      HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
      Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 6 MARCH 1974

      Remimeo 
      Expanded Dianetics 
           Auditors 
           C/Ses 
      M7/M4 Star-rate 
      Clay Demo

      INTROSPECTION RD
      SECOND ADDITION
      INFORMATION TO C/ Ses

      FIXATED ATTENTION

      Ref: The Creation of Human Ability, R2-39 and R2-23

      Sometimes the C/S runs into the case whose attention is solidly 
      fixed on something. When attention is fixed we have an unawareness
of 
      other things than the object of fixation and a lessening of
      self-determinism 
      to a point of other determinism. Example: The pc is always
bringing up

      cars. He has trouble with cars, has ARC breaks about cars, W/Hs
about 
      cars, commits overts on cars. It worries him all the time, is a
      constant 
      problem.

      The fixated attention case appears not to as-is and is usually
stuck 
      on the track in the "quiet" portion of an incident. Ahead of it
and
      behind it 
      is extreme randomity. This is not easily confronted so is
not-ised.
      The 
      solution is to get the pc to exercise his attention, putting it
here
      and there.

      INTROVERSION AND ATTENTION

      The pc whose attention is fixated manifests it in several ways. He 
      will be continuously introverted on the area, will bring it up
often
      in 
      session but it doesn't seem to blow. It also shows up in
      correspondence to 
      the C/S, frequent originations at Examiner, a fixed vague stare,
all 
      evidence of introversion. The pc may not originate it.

      ANATOMY AND REMEDY

      This fixation shows up as a problem but it is usually a hidden 
      standard, a special problem the pc thinks must be resolved before
      auditing 
      can be seen to have worked. Hence the NCG (no case gain) aspect.
It is

      always an old problem of long duration.

      The remedy basically involves getting the terminal connected with 
      the area of fixation located and having the pc put his attention
on
      the 
      terminal and take his attention off the terminal.

      THE PROCESS

      STEP 1-Determine exactly what the pc has attention fixed on, 
      by folder inspection or 2WC for a BD F/N item.

      613

      STEP 2-Get the area translated into a terminal. This will read 
      well and have a high degree of pc interest.

      STEP 3-Fit the terminal in the commands: "Put your attention on 
      (termi- ~~2-" "Take your attention off (terminal)." Clear and run
it 
      alternate repetitive to the EP of pc's attention no longer fixed
on
      the area, 
      F/N Cog VGIs. This is called Attention Subjective Repetitive.

      STEP 4-Select two objects. Best are a red pen and a blue pen. 
      Two bowling pins will also do. Place them three to four feet apart
at
      a 
      distance of three to four feet from the pc. Place them on white
paper
      for 
      visibility.

      STEP 5-Name the objects and fit them in the commands: "Put 
      your attention on the red pen." "Put your attention on the blue
pen."
      Clear 
      the commands and run them alternate repetitive to the EP of pc in

      control 
      of his attention, F/N Cog VGIs. This is called Attention Objective 
      Repetitive.

      ALTERNATE STEP S-Name the objects and fit them in the 
      following commands: "Decide to put your attention on the red pen.
Tell

      me when you've done so." "Put your attention on it." Then "Decide
to
      put 
      your attention on the blue pen. Tell me when you've done so." "Put
      your 
      attention on it." Run this alternate repetitive until the pc is
doing
      the 
      decision step each time, then you can drop out the "Tell me when
      you've 
      done so." Run it to the EP of pc in control of his attention, F/N
Cog
      VGIs. 
      This is called Attention Objective Decision Repetitive.

      NOTE: With both these objective attention processes the pc may 
      swear you are hypnotizing him or something. The process actually
runs 
      out hypnotism. The pc will come through a band of robotism and
come 
      out the other end IN CONTROL OF HIS OWN ATTENTION.

      VITAL PROCESS DATA

      It would never be okay to run Attention Subjective Repetitive on a 
      significance (a no-mass thing). It must be run on a terminal. This
is
      a 
      ONE-SHOT PROCESS, depending for its effectiveness on the
correctness 
      of the first item selected.

      This item is usually unmistakable in a truly fixated case.

      PROGRAMING

      Attention Subjective and Objective Repetitive fits in sequence on 
      the Introspection RD between Steps 6L and 7.

      If the terminal connected with the area of fixed attention could
not 
      be located then the area could not be addressed with Attention
      Subjective 
      Repetitive, but in some other manner. It is unlikely that no
terminal
      could 
      be found on a truly fixated attention case.

      ISOLATION

      When a person is released from isolation after terminated handling 
      of a psychotic break it is usual to welcome them back and restore
any
      lost 
      ARC for them from the group, if needed, with an announcement in
the 
      OODs.

      The person would be interviewed as to whether he wanted to stay 
      or go and what his intentions were.

      614

      Formal notification would be made that the person was back in 
      good graces and he would be allowed to make up for any damage
done, 
      but not forced to do so. In the case of a crew member, it would be 
      expected he would be assigned to the RPF where there was one, and
told

      to make good.

      ADDITIONAL
      CLEARED CANNIBAL STEP

      There is an additional tool for use by the C/S in raising the pc's 
      responsibility. The C/S sends to the pc HCOB 21 Jan. AD 10 
      JUSTIFICATION with a note asking the pc to please read the HCOB
then 
      tell the C/S if it has any application.

      This would be done as the first of the series of C/S notes and pc 
      replies on the Cleared Cannibal Step.

      If the C/S receives any "rant and rave" in reply he would order it 
      Dated and Located as the pc would be answering out of an incident.

      Regardless, the Justification HCOB would have to be followed by 
      O/Ws as the pc has W/Hs there to be restimmed and not running out
the 
      O/Ws could cause the TA to skyrocket.

      C/SING ON PSYCHOS

      C/Sing and auditing psychos is a very precise and even touchy 
      business. There must be no mistakes and you cannot be heavy-handed
on 
      them. They are at the lowest point on the Effect Scale and
therefore 
      delicate at best and easily overwhelmed.

      It is also policy that a C/S takes it easy on auditors handling 
      psychos. They are very hard to audit and difficult to control. So
      don't 
      berate the auditor. If they get any kind of a result, three
cheers.

      INTEGRITY

      It has always been a rule that actions of one RD are not mixed in 
      with another action or used randomly outside of the RD.

      Recently I found that a technique from the Introspection RD was 
      used to indicate bypassed charge or something when handling ruds.
This
      is 
      very wrong. This happened in the field as an isolated instance but
is
      worth 
      mentioning.

      The integrity of any RD must be maintained or its effectiveness is 
      reduced. When parts of a RD are used at random by a C/S it
actually
      starts 
      the pc on a RD that is left incomplete.

      So don't extract bits of this RD and use them on other actions.
You 
      would do yourself and the pc a disservice.


      L. RON 
      HUBBARD Founder

      Assisted 
      by CS-4



      615

      HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
      Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

      HCO BULLETIN OF 20 APRIL 1974R
      REVISED 25 APRIL 1991
      Remimeo 
      Expanded Dianetics 
           Auditors 
           C/Ses

      INTROSPECTION RD-THIRD ADDITION
      Adds to HCOB 23 Jan. 74RB

      ADDITIONAL INTROSPECTION RD STEPS

      (The additional Introspection Rundown Steps have been added
      to HCOB 23 Jan. 74RB, THE TECHNICAL BREAKTHROUGH OF
      1973t THE INTROSPECTION RD, as steps 14E-14I and 23A-23G.)

      The Introspection Rundown has as its dominant Flow, Flow 0. 
      This follows from basic O/W theory where the person goes down the 
      dwindling spiral to a point where he can only restrain himself and
do 
      himself in.

      CAUTION REGARDING EVIL PURPOSES

      Do not run unreading items, miss reads or run wrong items as it 
      will wind the pc up in the soup.

      A common error on R3RAing evil purposes culled from the W/Ses 
      has shown up that C/Ses must be alert for. This is taking up
      infinitive 
      phrases like "to go to the store" that appear to be evil purposes
but
      in 
      actual fact are statements of future actions or conditions, not
      intentions.

      Example: Pc says, "I was doing fine then Joe came along and 
      caused me to cave in." "To cave in" is not an evil purpose as
stated.
      It 
      wasn't the pc's intention. Not valid.

      Example: Pc says, "I was trying to hold on to the rope and he 
      forced me to fall off the cliff." "To fall off the cliff" was not
the
      pc's 
      intention but a statement of an action. Not valid.

      Example: Pc says, "I wanted to make them wrong and got sick." 
      "To make them wrong" was the intention, is valid and runnable.

      Have you got the idea? If there is any question in your mind,
clear 
      the word "intention," then go over a grammar text and sort out
what an

      infinitive and infinitive phrase are and how they're used.

      You'll save the pc and yourself a lot of difficulty if you do
this.

      L. RON 
      HUBBARD
      Founder

      Assisted by 
      CS-4

      Revision 
      assisted by
      LRH 
      Technical Research 
      and 
      Compilations

      625



       

                                         L. RON HUBBARD
                                         FOUNDER
